Custom business web application development
Every team has a workaround that works. Someone checks a sheet, remembers who to chase, and retypes the same figures into a system that fits everyone except them. That knowledge belongs on a screen.
Where it goes wrong
A sheet says one number and the software says another. Whoever answers first wins the argument.
One person knows what has to happen before what. When they are away, the work sits and waits.
The same rows moved between two screens that were never introduced to each other.
What we build
Ownership
How it runs
A session spent following how the work really gets done, including the parts nobody wrote down.
Whichever view removes the most retyping. It is in daily use before anything else is designed.
Each round adds what people asked for while working in it, not what was guessed in a meeting.
Accounts, code and a recorded tour. Whether we stay on is decided afterwards.
A sheet cannot stop two people editing the same row, refuse an impossible date, or say who changed a figure last Tuesday. Most of the value is in what it refuses.
They are quick until the day you need something the tool does not offer. Then the workaround starts again, one level up, and you are paying for it monthly.
Where an interface exists, yes: accounting, mail, calendars, most sales tools. Where none exists, we import on a schedule so at least nobody is retyping.
You do. Accounts are opened in your name and handed over through a password manager. We keep the access you choose to give us, for as long as you want us there.
That is the point. It is ordinary React and Postgres, commented, with a readme that explains the shape of the thing. No framework invented here.
Show us the sheet everyone actually uses. By the end you will have a figure for what the retyping costs you every month.
Book a call